Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf once again files reference with SJC for Dr. Sikandar Sultan Raja’s removal as CEC
ISLAMABAD, Oct 18 (SABAH): The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Tuesday once again moved the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Dr. Sikandar Sultan Raja under claims that he is biased in favour of certain political parties.
The petition, filed by PTI Central Vice President Senator Ejaz Ahmed Chaudhry and PTI MNA Maleeka Ali Bukhari through their lawyer Dr. Babar Awan, claimed that the incumbent CEC was “not fit to hold the constitutional post under Article 213” – which discusses the appointment of the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) chief by the president.
It furthered that due to “ulterior motives” the ECP did not accept the resignations of the 123 PTI National Assembly Members (MNAs) after they resigned en masse in protest of former premier Imran Khan’s ouster.
The CEC “in connivance with the imported/imposed government took no time to issue a notification…whereby the resignations of only 11 MNAs of PTI were accepted”, the petition declared
It maintained that CEC Dr. Sikandar Sultan Raja was “known to have malice against” the PTI and its chief Imran Khan and “conveniently went along with the government in the selective culling of PTI MNAs”.
“The conduct of the Respondent Chief Election Commissioner in accepting the resignations in a piecemeal manner is clearly indicative of [the] fact that he is favouring a political party and clearly has an ill will against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf”. It added that the electoral chief had “lost sight of the oath [he] took”.
The petition further alleged that the “collusion and connivance” of the CEC and ECP was more evident in the case of prohibited funding wherein the PTI had requested that the electoral watchdog scrutinises the accounts of all political parties but Sikandar “chose otherwise while discriminatingly singling out” the former ruling party.
“This clearly establishes the mala fide, biasness and collusion on part of the Chief Election Commissioner”.
The petition also maintained that the CEC’s “illicit relationship” with the current government was apparent as earlier he had refused to postpone elections in the PTI stronghold of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa despite “genuine concerns…owing to the prevailing weather conditions” but was “more than willing to accommodate” the request of the government and postpone local government elections in Sindh.
It concluded that the CEC “had clearly violated his oath” and the ECP’s code of conduct as he continued his “clear discriminatory attitude” making his integrity “questionable”.