Hasina’s downfall…Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry
AS Sheikh Hasina Wajed boarded a military helicopter to flee from Dhaka last Monday, TV television screens showed scenes of angry protesters ransacking her official residence and hacking away at statues of her father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the first leader of Bangladesh, who himself was assassinated this month in 1975.
The student-led protests over civil service job quotas spiralled out of control and became the immediate cause for the downfall of Sheikh Hasina, who ruled Bangladesh from 1996 to 2001, and then again from 2009-2024. However, most Bangladesh watchers believe she was sitting atop a volcano waiting to erupt, a volcano that her own repressive policies, human rights abuses, and a rigged election last January had created.
Since 2009, Hasina had ruled Bangladesh with an iron fist. Systematically, she clamped down all political opponents. Her main political rival, Khaleda Zia of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, who served twice as prime minister, was caught in a web of legal cases and sentenced to 17 years in prison in 2018.
The leaders of the Jamaat-i-Islami also faced brutal persecution; many of them were convicted and executed by a so-called international crimes tribunal. In the final days before her unceremonious end, Hasina had exhorted Awami League supporters to fight the demonstrators, which brought the country to the brink of a civil war.
Pakistan and Bangladesh can make a fresh start.
Where is Bangladesh headed now? In the wake of Hasinas flight, complete mayhem has engulfed the country. The residences of former ministers were ransacked, and Mujibur Rahmans home in Dhanmondi was attacked. The police went on strike, and total chaos enveloped the country for days. Parliament has been dissolved, and an interim government headed by Muhammad Yunus formed.
The top priority at this stage is to restore law and order and then hold fresh elections so that a truly representative government comes to power. If that is not done, the unrest might continue because the people would not want to move from one dictatorial rule (Sheikh Hasinas) to another. It is important for the people to resume their life. As it is, Bangladeshs economy had begun to decline after years of impressive growth, and economic inequalities and unemployment have increased.
To what extent are these developments a setback for India, the Sheikh Hasina regimes main foreign backer? Indias foreign policy under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has increasingly become more assertive and hegemonic towards its smaller neighbours. Bangladesh under Sheikh Hasinas watch was being perceived as subservient to India, much to the resentment of the people, who wanted Indias friendship but not its dominance.
This writer had the opportunity to participate in the Bay of Bengal conversations in Dhaka in 2022, and could sense growing discomfort regarding Indias dominating influence over Bangladesh. In that session, a Bangladeshi-American scholar discussed his article Saath saath [together] or too close for comfort? on Bangladeshs relations with India. In many ways, it represented the prevailing sentiment.
How will these developments affect Pakistans relations with Bangladesh? This is an opportunity to reset ties. Sheikh Hasina had cut off all links with Pakistan, even though her father, Mujibur Rahman, had committed to forgetting the past and making a fresh start when he signed a tripartite agreement between Bangladesh, India and Pakistan in April 1974.
Sheikh Hasina refused to bury the bitterness of the past, and started using the UN platform to propagate false claims that three million Bengalis were killed in 1971, a claim that is grossly exaggerated and evidentially rejected by impartial observers. It is regrettable that excesses were committed by all sides, and hence it is important for both countries to let bygones be bygones and move on. Instead, she tried to politicise the events of 1971 to her own advantage, and continued to deepen estrangement with Pakistan. When India refused to join the Saarc summit in Islamabad in 2016, Sheikh Hasina teamed up with it to make Saarc, which was created in Dhaka in 1985, dysfunctional.
Given that there are large segments of people in Bangladesh and Pakistan who would like to normalise bilateral ties, a fresh beginning can be made, first by the interim government, and later when an elected government assumes power in Bangladesh. One hopes that fresh elections are held soon, as the democratic ethos of the people of Bangladesh must be respected.
An important lesson for Pakistan is for our political parties to adopt a culture of live and let live, respect peoples aspirations, and resolve issues through the democratic way of negotiations in parliament, and not on the streets.
Courtesy Dawn