Debt, climate, inflation…Ali Tauqeer Sheikh
DEBT, climate, and inflation have in recent years become important planks of the spring meetings hosted by the World Bank and IMF. The agenda for this years meetings, which concluded last week, included finding ways to reform the global financial architecture, mobilise additional development and climate finance, and strengthen international cooperation to address multiple global crises, especially their impact on developing countries. For us in Pakistan, these issues blend with the countrys economic vulnerabilities, climate imperatives, and foreign policy compulsions. Are we doing enough to integrate them at the policy level?
The agenda of the spring meetings has evolved over the years from simpler institutional issues to redesigning the architecture of the global financial system. This years meetings were particularly important as they coincided with the 80th anniversary of Bretton Woods. While the World Bank is seeking how best to ramp up its lending, the IMF is emerging as the guardian of global financial and climate resilience. They are now faced with the unfolding challenge of financing development and climate change and the need to equip themselves to deal with the deepening impacts of debt, climate change, and inflation.
It is too early to know exactly what was decided at the spring meetings. The details will emerge slowly and be reflected in the G20 policy decisions during the year. While Pakistan was busy negotiating the Extended Fund Facility with the IMF, key issues of particular interest to it were discussed at the spring meetings: i) reversal of development gains and increase in poverty levels, ii) addressing the burden of public debt that is crowding out crucial investments, iii) strengthening global cooperation and multilateralism, and iv) reaffirming the commitment to the SDGs.
The concept of debt sustainability generally refers to the ability of a country to manage its debt without unrealistic adjustment to the balance of income and expenditure or the growth of its economy. Pakistan is eligible under the Chinese-supported Debt Sustainability Initiative and the G20-supported Debt Service Suspension Initiative, and has received debt relief under the DSSI from several creditors following its climate-triggered floods.
The Bridgetown Initiative seeks to unlock liquidity support through six key actions.
Such initiatives made way for the Bridgetown Initiative that aims to address the shortcomings of the current global financial architecture that has exacerbated inequalities and the inability to respond to the scale of global climate challenges. A proposal was made by Prime Minister Mia Mottley of Barbados and her climate finance envoy Avinash Persaud, who had initially proposed the initiative at Glasgow at COP27 in 2022. It has won support from IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva, in addition to that of the World Bank, UN, the French and UK governments and several countries of the Global South. The initiative has since been actively advanced through key international forums including the Paris Summit on a New Global Finance Pact in June and the COP28 in December 2023. Pakistan has thus far taken a back seat.
The Bridgetown Initiative seeks to unlock liquidity support through six key actions:
First, providing immediate liquidity support, including rechannelling at least $100 billion of unused special drawing rights through equitable mechanisms. Second, increasing development lending to reach $500bn in annual stimulus for investment for SDGs. Third, mobilising $1.5 trillion per year of private sector investment in green transformation. Fourth, transforming the governance of international financial institutions to make them more representative, equitable and inclusive. Fifth, creating an international trade system that supports global green and just transformations. Sixth, restoring debt sustainability and supporting countries in restructuring their debt with long-term low-interest financing.
Responding to climate-triggered disasters in countries like Pakistan, the initiative has encouraged the inclusion of a clause that would stipulate a temporary suspension of interest payments on debt. The additional financial resources for rebuilding, it is argued, should be in the form of grants, instead of loans.
Pakistan has a vested interest in the success of the Bridgetown Initiative. It has built an environment for the V20 Accra-Marrakech agenda on debt sustainability. Launched at the 2023 spring meetings, it seeks to reform the global debt architecture to better address debt sustainability challenges. The Vulnerable Twenty is a coalition of 55 climate-vulnerable developing countries, and an offshoot bloc of the broader Climate Vulnerable Forum launched in 2015.
It has advocated enhancing the G20s Common Framework for Debt Treatments to address debt sustainability. The agenda emphasises the need for a new set of rules and a roadmap to reform and transform the sovereign debt architecture. The purpose is to align it with climate and development goals, rather than just focusing on short-term debt stabilisation, an approach that is often spearheaded by IMF. It has advocated ambitious steps: i) establishing a Climate Mitigation Trust to draw in $5tr in private savings for climate action, ii) widening access to concessional finance for climate adaptation and resilience, iii) expanding MDB lending for climate and sustainable development by $1tr, iv) funding loss and damage from climate change, and v) making the financial system more shock-absorbent.
This has catalysed a global debate on systemic reform and coordinated action on climate and development. Most remarkably, its articulation on supporting the establishment of the Loss & Damage Fund has helped create an enabling environment for about $750 million in pledges to the fund.
The Bridgetown Initiative was a key topic of discussion at this years spring meetings. There is indeed resistance to reforming existing power structures. It faces political and technical challenges in reshaping the global financial system to better address the debt and liquidity needs of developing countries.
Overcoming these obstacles will require sustained commitment to engaging with a wide range of stakeholders. Pakistans case of getting a pause in repayments, or the restructuring of its debt, and accessing international climate finance will enjoy stronger credibility if its narrative is closely aligned with the global discourse. For this, well need to coordinate our position and seek alignments with climate-vulnerable groups.
Can Pakistans economic, climate and foreign policies latch on to the current international initiatives to manage debt, climate and inflation challenges?
Courtesy Dawn