PTI’s protest politics: eroding constitutional order…Durdana Najam
PTI’s recent protests have reignited a troubling pattern in Pakistani politics: the prioritisation of street agitation over democratic dialogue. At a time when the country desperately needs stability and political maturity, PTI’s approach has veered dangerously towards confrontational tactics, undermining the very democratic principles it claims to defend. Instead of engaging with the opposition and fostering a culture of parliamentary debate, the party remains fixated on street protests and inflammatory rhetoric, deepening political polarisation and jeopardising national stability.
A mature democracy thrives on dialogue, negotiation and compromise. Political differences, no matter how profound, are best addressed within the framework of parliamentary institutions. PTI’s refusal to engage constructively with the opposition reflects a troubling disregard for democratic norms. By consistently portraying the opposition as inherently corrupt and illegitimate, the party fosters an environment where meaningful dialogue is impossible. While corruption is a serious concern, it must be addressed through transparent investigations and parliamentary oversight – not through street protests and sweeping accusations. Resorting to public agitation only exacerbates divisions and undermines efforts for genuine accountability.
The party’s demands – Imran Khan’s release; withdrawal of the 26th Amendment; and restoration of an allegedly stolen mandate – are presented without room for negotiation or compromise. This suggests an unwillingness to engage in the give-and-take necessary for democratic governance. Rather than presenting a clear institutional strategy, PTI has opted for a confrontational stance that leaves little room for dialogue. This approach alienates potential allies and diminishes its credibility as a proponent of democratic reform.
The reliance on street agitation has far-reaching consequences. The violence sparked by these protests has already resulted in the deaths of four Rangers and numerous injuries, transforming the capital city into a war zone. This escalation of violence, with the government resorting to heavy teargas shelling to restore order, sends a clear message of instability and chaos. The loss of life and widespread injuries among law enforcement officers only highlight the dangerous potential of PTI’s protest strategy. Violence and disruption do not strengthen democracy; they erode public trust and undermine the rule of law. The involvement of Afghan citizens in some protests further complicates the situation, politicising vulnerable populations and creating new security challenges. Such actions destabilise regions like K-P, where decades of conflict have already left deep scars. By fuelling unrest in fragile areas, PTI risks undoing years of progress and exacerbating existing tensions.
Bushra Bibi’s recent remarks highlight another troubling aspect of PTI’s strategy. Until recently, she maintained a non-political role, but her video message alleging Saudi Arabia over Imran Khan’s removal introduced a new layer of complexity. Such statements, based on unsubstantiated claims, not only strain diplomatic relations but also reflect a broader trend of conspiracy theorising within the party. PTI has often criticised others for involving family members in politics, yet it now finds itself entangled in similar controversies. This hypocrisy undermines its moral authority and distracts from genuine issues of governance and accountability.
PTI’s confrontational tactics also damage Pakistan’s international standing. The recent disruption of a Belarusian delegation’s visit illustrates this point. Diplomatic engagements are crucial for fostering international partnerships and attracting investment, but the protests created an environment of instability that sent a negative message to the global community. Such incidents tarnish Pakistan’s image and deter future diplomatic and economic opportunities. At a time when the country needs to build international trust, PTI’s approach has had the opposite effect.
A responsible opposition is essential for a healthy democracy. It holds the government accountable and provides constructive alternatives. However, PTI’s current strategy is counterproductive. By rejecting dialogue and resorting to agitation, the party undermines the institutions it seeks to reform. Political maturity requires recognising that differences can be resolved through debate and negotiation, not street violence and inflammatory rhetoric. PTI must move beyond its confrontational stance and engage with the opposition in a spirit of democratic cooperation.
The government, too, bears responsibility for finding a resolution. Rather than dismissing PTI’s concerns outright, it must create avenues for addressing the issues raised by the opposition. This does not mean conceding to unrealistic demands but engaging in dialogue that acknowledges legitimate grievances. Reforms and policy adjustments that address underlying concerns could help defuse tensions and demonstrate a commitment to democratic inclusion. A proactive approach by the government can prevent further escalation and foster a more cooperative political environment.
Crucially, PTI must shift its focus from Imran Khan as an individual to the broader institutional reforms it claims to support. During its time in power, the party often weakened parliamentary processes rather than strengthening them. True democratic reform requires more than slogans and protests; it demands a commitment to enhancing the very institutions that safeguard democracy. By concentrating solely on Imran Khan’s legal battles, PTI risks reducing its movement to a personality cult rather than a force for systemic change.
Strengthening parliamentary democracy is essential to reducing undue influence from extra-constitutional forces. Political parties, including PTI, must recognise that their actions either strengthen or weaken democratic institutions. By perpetuating instability and rejecting dialogue, PTI leaves a power vacuum that can be exploited by forces within or outside the country. True democratic strength lies in robust institutions, accountable governance and a culture of dialogue.
Pakistan faces significant challenges – economic instability, security threats and social inequality – that demand a united and responsible political leadership. The country cannot afford further division and unrest. PTI has the potential to play a constructive role in addressing these issues, but only if it abandons its current path and embraces a more democratic, collaborative approach. The future of Pakistan’s democracy depends not on who shouts the loudest in the streets but on who builds consensus and fosters meaningful change within the halls of parliament.
Courtesy 