SC refers matter to Practice & Procedure Committee after objection on bench hearing case pertaining to civilians’ trial in military courts

ISLAMABAD, April 24 (SABAH): The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Wednesday, after reservations raised against the six-member bench hearing the military courts case, referred the matter to the Practice and Procedure Committee former under Practice and Procedure Act 2023 for reconstitution of the bench.

A six-member larger bench on Wednesday, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan and comprising Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Syed Hassan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Shahid Waheed, Justice Musarrat Hilali and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, conducted the hearing on the civilians’ trials in military courts who were involved in the May 9 incidents last year.

During the hearing, petitioner former chief justice Jawad S Khawaja’s lawyer Khawaja Ahmad Hussain raised an objection on the bench, saying that a larger bench should be constituted in light of Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Yahya Afridi’s note.

The lawyer said that a larger bench comprising at least 9 judges should be formed to hear this case, adding that the real question is whether civilians can be tried in military courts or not.

On January 29, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood rescued himself from hearing intra-court appeals against civilians’ trial in military court, leading to the dissolution of a six-member larger bench.

Following the lawyer’s objection to the bench, the apex court referred the matter to the Practice and Procedure Committee.

At the outset of the hearing on Wednesday, Attorney General for Pakistan Barrister Mansoor Usman Awan told the court that 20 people who have completed their sentences were released before Eid-ul-Fitr.

Justice Rizvi inquired whether the verdict of the people who were released part of the court’s record. Justice Hilali ordered to bring the military court’s verdict on the court record.  “The military court’s verdict will tell what procedure was adopted in the trial,” said Justice Waheed.

Later, Justice Mazhar said that they want to see whether the court had allowed the people permission to appoint a lawyer of their choice.

One of the petitioners and senior lawyer, Aitzaz Ahsan, said that the court did not issue certificates to those who were in custody for a year. To which, the SC said that there is no such certificate.

Lawyer Khawaja Ahmed Hussain said that Justice Yahya Afridi had opined that a six-member bench cannot decide this case.

To this, Justice Mazhar said that Justice Yahya opinion cannot be called a judicial order.

Hussain then questioned how can civilians be tried in military courts, saying that the FB Ali case should be re-examined.

At this point, lawyer Salman Akram Raja said that this case should be heard by at least eight member bench.

Justice Waheed asked what would happen if the judges panel decide the same bench will hear the appeals. At this, Raja said that they will accept the bench.

Journalist Hafeezullah Khan Niazi became emotional during the hearing, saying that his son, Hassan Khan Niazi is missing and he is unable to meet him.

At this, the top court instructed the AGP to inform SC after finding details about Hassan Niazi.